It is still really annoying that Apple forces this dilemma on buyers - true, 8GB/256GB will turn out to be adequate for many people but it shouldn't cost anything like $400 to buy yourself a bit of "headroom" and 16/512 is a far more sensible starting point unless you know you're only going to be doing "personal productivity". Having a small-ish system+apps+work-in-progress drive and keeping your content on a large external drive is a perfectly viable idea, although MacOS could make it a bit easier to configure this and make it stick. Most of the advantages of Apple's super-fast SSDs come from having the system, swap, applications and temporary storage on the internal SSD. Also, what other people have posted bears repeating: you don't want your main system drive getting anywhere close to 100% full or it will clobber performance.įor storing your own documents/data files, external, cloud or NAS is fine, and some apps do let you re-locate large media libraries etc. I'd say that 256GB is fine for "personal productivity" stuff, but could get tight if you're doing any sort of media creation, installing multiple "pro" apps or using virtual machines etc. It really depends on what you are doing with your computer. So you have to think of not just 2024 but also 2029+.Ĭlick to expand.I'd guess that if you were planning on doing audio production or serious video editing you wouldn't be asking the question. Will your user section add much of any of that? Will your wife want a user section added to the new Mac for her (and her higher storage demands now)? With Silicon Macs, you can't grow initial internal specs later if you decide you want/need more. Now think not just for today but also into the future. What was in her user section that was so big? Photos? Music? Video? Podcasts? You got a little taste of this by your wife sharing the Mac and eating up a LOT of storage. though not necessarily on the internal drive IF you are willing to manage it on an external(s) and catch it when external disconnects. It's this kind of stuff- especially video- that will demand big chunks of space. ![]() There's basic math done in post #4 but then it doesn't seem to consider if you perhaps have 500 CDs to scan. Else, you can certainly move big media stuff to an external drive and then just police that scenario on the fly. Point: unless you don't mind keeping up and catching such things when they happen- and they will- you need enough internal storage to hold the core (Apple App) media: both what you have today and what you will add over life of the device. It's not and you remedy it by re-associating main library with the one on the hub drive. Then a new library is created on the internal drive and all of your music seems to be missing. until you open music and the hub is disconnected. Those too can become quite large over time and seem natural to store externally. Yes, you can then manually merge the two once you realize what has happened and reassign the main library to the external drive again but you need to be sensitive to this scenario. When library is not findable, Photos makes a new library on the internal drive. until you open it one day and the hub is NOT connected. ![]() For example, photo libraries can get very large over time, so storing the Photos app library on an external seems like a great idea. Yes, you can certainly do it- I do myself- and it can work fine but things can happen. MacOS doesn't "like" things expected to be stored on internal drive moved to external drives.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |